It is necessary to take into account, that the solvency that give those who place liquidity, allows an exchange ecosystem, of not being, you could not even sell or buy. Also, in case the liquidity was much more girl than the current one, any operation that is carried out, would dismember the value of the Token.
The question more than nothing happens through two topics, more usability for the Token, and greater participation of users in liquidity placement (the latter, automatically makes the flung from APY and APR-ROI, besides giving more liquidity and solidity To the currency, since there would be greater flow, immensely lowering the volatility of the currency).
If you are limiting, you have to take into account, which are people who put your money at stake, in front of others who do not, if you ask that the distribution is carried out, only when you cure, then the reward distributed for them, minimally It would have to be of 5 to 10 times more than anything I place in liquidity, in turn, this should be proportional to the percentage amount that has placed in the background, unlike with the other investors. In case of not voting or cured, keep in mind, that its capital is at stake 24 hours, and others use it, so liquidity reward should continue to be distributed, but less extent, maybe equal to the maximum reward of the That does not place liquidity.
To what I am going, there must be proportionality between the one who risks capital and the one who does not. Because there apparently nobody thinks that the one who was juice putting yup-eth, he loses a lot when some of the two Cryptos fall, and that is not shared among all.